The LEADER programme implementation in Central European countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53098/wir.2010.4.149/02Keywords:
LEADER, Central Europe, European UnionAbstract
The implementation of a new European policy based on integrated rural development is an entirely new experiment in the Central European countries, which formerly belonged to the communist system. The paper attempts to explore the conditions and the context in which the Local Development Model is being transferred from the “old” member-states to the new ones, and the methods of its implementation. To examine this issue, we consider the European Union’s Leader programme (an acronym of Liaisons Entre Actions de Développement de l’Economie Rurale) which became the fourth axis of the European Rural Policy (2007-2013). The Leader approach is usually presented as an original way of supporting local development, especially through the Local Action Group (LAG) which is a local body composed of public and private actors. We focus on how this approach is put into effect in three new member states (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland).Downloading policy to the local communities takes place via various hierarchical modes of governance. Domestic authorities (or transfer operators) transpose and implement European rules and norms which are more flexible than the former development policies. Looking at the main differences between the four countries we explore how the original model is being distorted by domestic institutional factors. Policy transfer processes are not restricted to the ministries of agriculture but involve a wide variety of non-governmental actors mediating the transfer of the model to the local stakeholders who are the acting receivers. The Leader model is experimented in various territorial and social contexts, more or less receptive to this new way of thinking and managing local development.The paper is based on the relevant academic literature, on official national sources and a field research survey. It is a cross-national comparative work that takes into account national and local variations in order to highlight similarities and differences in the transfer of a policy model.References
BALDERSHEIM H., ILLNER M., WOLLMANN H., 2003: Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. Urban Research International. Leske, Budrich, Opladen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10677-7
BRUCKMEIER K., 2000: LEADER in Germany and the Discourse of Autonomous Regional Development. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 40, 2: 219–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00144
BULLER H., 2000: Re-creating Rural Territories: LEADER in France. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 40, 2: 190–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00141
BULMER S., DOLOWITZ D., HUMPHREYS P., PADGETT S., 2007: Policy Transfer in European Union Governance: Regulating the Utilities. Routledge, Abingdon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964743
DARGAN L., SHUCKSMITH M., 2008: LEADER and innovation. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 48: 271–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x
DELPEUCH T., 2009: Comprendre la circulation internationale des solutions d'action publique: panorama des Policy Transfer Studies. ”Critique internationale” 43: 153–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.043.0153
DENTERS B., ROSE L.E., 2005: Comparing Local Governance. Trends and Developments. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21242-8
DOLOWITZ D., MARSH D., 1996: Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature. ”Political Studies” 44: 343–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
GORTON M., HUBBARD C., HUBBARD L., 2009: The folly of European Union Policy Transfer: Why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) Does not fit Central and Eastern Europe. ”Regional Studies” 43: 10, 1305–1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802508802
HALAMSKA M., 2005: Rozwój wiejski w Portugalii w latach 1986–2000. Wzór czy przestroga dla Polski? [Le développement rural au Portugal dans les années 1986–2000. Un modele ou un avertissement pour la Pologne?]. IRWIR PAN, Warszawa.
HALAMSKA M., 2008: Social Capital in Rural Areas. A Reconstruction Attempt. „Przegląd Socjologiczny” LVII- 4: 69–93.
HALL P., 1993: Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy making in Britain. ”Comparative Politics” 25: 275–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
HIGH C., NEMES G., 2007: Social Learning in LEADER: Exogenous, Endogenous and Hybrid Evaluation in Rural Development. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 47, 2: 103–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00430.x
HIRSCHHAUSEN B. von, LACQUEMENT G., 2007: Modeles de l'Ouest, territoires de l'Est. Le développement local et la valorisation du patrimoine dans les campagnes d'Allemagne orientale. ”Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest” 38, 3: 5–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/receo.2007.1844
KOVACH I., 2000: LEADER, a New Social Order and the Central-and East-European Countries. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 40, 2: 181–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00140
KOVACH I., 2002: Leadership, Local Power and Rural Restructuring in Hungary. In: Leadership,
Local Power and Rural Restructuring in Contemporary Europe. Dir. K. Halfacree, I. Kovach, R. Woodward. Ashgate, Aldershot, Burlington, Singapore, Sydney.
KOVACH I., KUÈEROVÁ E., 2006: The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 46, 1: 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00403.x
LACQUEMENT G., 2007: Le développement local comme processus politique endogene dans les Nouveaux Länder: modeles et acteurs a l'épreuve de la réunification. ”Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest” 38, 3: 97–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/receo.2007.1848
Les acteurs locaux a l'épreuve du modele européen LEADER. France – Hongrie – Pologne, 2010. Eds. M. Halamska, M.C. Maurel CEFRES – IRWIR, Prague.
MAUREL M.C., 2008a: Vers une nouvelle gouvernance des territoires en Hongrie? ”Cahiers d'études hongroises” 14 2007/2008, tome 1: 399–439.
MAUREL M.C., 2008b: Local Development Stakeholders and the European Model. Learning the LEADER Approach in the New Member States. ”Czech Sociological Review” 44: 3, 511–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2008.44.3.04
MAUREL M.C., HALAMSKA M., 2006: Démocratie et gouvernement local en Pologne. CNRS éditions, Paris.
MAUREL M.C., LACQUEMENT G., 2007: Agriculture et ruralité en Europe centrale. Aux lieux d'etre-CEFRES, Paris.
MEYER-SAHLING J.H., 2007: Héritages, concurrence entre les partis et gouvernance de la fonction publique dans la Hongrie postcommuniste. ”Critique internationale” 35: 51–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.035.0051
NEMES G., 2005: The politics of rural development in Europe. Discussion papers. Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences MT-DP' 5: 38.
OSTI G., 2000: LEADER and Partnerships: the case of Italy. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 40, 2: 172–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00139
PLESIAT M., MARTY P., 2010: Actors and partnerships in the LAGs: a new civic space? A Czech case study. Paper to the Regional studies association conference. Pécs, 24–26th, May.
POLA P., KOVACS D., 2010: Some experiences of the Leader programme in Hungary. Preliminary results of the ALDETEC research. Paper to the Regional studies association conference. Pécs, 24th–26th May.
RADAELLI C., 2000: Policy transfer in the European Union. Institutional Isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. ”Governance” 13, 1: 25–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00122
RAY C., 2000: The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. ”Sociologia Ruralis” 40, 2: 163–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00138
SHORTALL S., SHUCKSMITH M., 1998: Integrated rural development: Issues arising from the Scottish experience. ”European Planning Studies” 6, 1: 73–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319808720446
The Cork Declaration: a living countryside, 1996. Commission of the European Communites. The future of Rural Society: Green paper, 1988. CEC.
Downloads
Article file downloads
Pages
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Wieś i Rolnictwo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
