From Collectivisation to Commodification: Transformations in Estonia’s Rural Landscape and Identity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53098/wir.2024.4.205/05Keywords:
land restitution, agricultural professionalisation, rural depopulation, landscape commodification, national identityAbstract
Estonia’s rural landscape has undergone a significant transformation from its Soviet collectivisation era to its post-re-independence restitution process and EU membership. Following Soviet collectivisation and rural depopulation, land restitution in the 1990s was driven by nationalistic ideals linking land ownership to identity and justice. However, initial idealism was tempered by economic and logistical challenges. EU integration accelerated agricultural professionalisation and concentration, with fewer but larger, specialised farms driving increased productivity. Concurrently, rural depopulation and urbanisation led to abandoned infrastructure and declining traditional livelihoods, though small-scale tourism and community initiatives have revitalised certain areas. The countryside, increasingly commodified as a recreational “playground”, now serves diverse roles, blending heritage preservation with contemporary leisure. These changes highlight a shift from utilitarian rural landscapes to multifunctional spaces reflecting urbanised values, necessitating a reevaluation of national identity and the socio-economic future of rural Estonia.
References
Antrop M. (1998). Landscape change: Plan or chaos? Landscape and Urban Planning, 41(3–4), 155–161.
Brandt J., Vejre H. (eds.). (2003a). Multifunctional Landscapes. Volume I: Theory, Values and History; 2. Monitoring, Diversity and Management. Ashurst Lodge: WIT Press.
Brandt J., Vejre H. (eds.). (2003b). Multifunctional Landscapes. Volume II: Monitoring, Diversity and Management. Ashurst Lodge: WIT Press.
Claval P. (2005). Reading the rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 9–19.
Eiter S. (2006). Transport infrastructure in the mountains: Why and how to protect landscape with human activity as part of its heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 13(1), 56–80.
Helm A. (2022). Looduslik elurikkus pollumajandusmaastikes: kestliku toidutootmise tähtis component. Riigikogu Toimetised, 45, 107–114.
Laviolette P. (2011). Extreme Landscapes of Leisure: Not a Hap-Hazardous Sport. Farnham: Ashgate.
Maandi P. (2009). The silent articulation of private land rights in Soviet Estonia: A geographical perspective. Geoforum, 40(3), 454–464.
Mander Ü., Antrop M. (eds.). (2003). Multifunctional Landscapes. Volume III: Continuity and Change. Ashurst Lodge: WIT Press.
Mander Ü., Palang H. (1994). Changes of landscape structure in Estonia during the Soviet period. GeoJournal, 33(1), 45–54.
Nugin R., Trell-Zuidema E.-M., Poder A. forthcoming: Maalisus. In: Sissejuhatus inimgeograafiasse.
Palang H. (2010). Time boundaries and landscape change: Collective farms 1947-1994. European Countryside, 2(3), 169–181.
Palang H., Sooväli-Sepping H. (2012). Are there counter-landscapes? On milk trestles and invisible power lines. Landscape Research, 37(4), 467–482.
Printsmann A., Linkola H., Zarina A., Vološina M., Häyrynen M., Palang H. (2019). Landscape 100: How Finland, Estonia and Latvia used landscape in celebrating their centenary anniversaries. European Countryside, 11(2), 187–210.
Printsmann A., Nugin R., Palang H. (2022). Intricacies of moral geographies of land restitution in Estonia. Land, 11(2), 235.
Rasva M., Jürgenson E. (2022). Agricultural land concentration in Estonia and its containment possibilities. Land, 11(12), 2270.