Efficiency of Agricultural Enterprises in Ukraine and the European Union: Assessment and Factors of Reproduction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53098/wir022022/03Keywords:
efficiency, reproductive factors, effectiveness, economy, functional organisation, agricultural enterprisesAbstract
The aim of the article is to examine the evaluation of the efficiency of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine and the European Union using the determinants of effectiveness, economy and functional organisation, which reflect the need for extended reproduction of final consumption and food security. Efficiency is assessed on the basis of the ratio of the required and achieved results, the economy and the processes of obtaining them, and the degree of use of the principles of functional organisation as a potential for sustainable reproduction and improvement of results. In this case, the systemic efficiency of agricultural enterprises reflects the results of meeting the needs and expectations of stakeholders – consumers, co-workers and local communities. When reproducing positive results, the specificity of the law of value in the agricultural sector should be considered; consistency and compliance of different types of capital and assets is achieved through the application of the principles of functional organization. This allows for the identification of factors of regulatory influence on the reproduction of the efficiency of agricultural enterprises.
References
Alexandratos N., Bruinsma J. (2012). World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12-03. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdf (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
Artemova T.I. (2006). Stoimost’ i tsena: logiko-istoricheskiy protsess formoobrazovaniya [Koszt i cena. Logiczno-historyczny proces kształtowania]. Kyiv: Osnova.
Chavas J.-P., Aliber M. (1993). An analysis of economic efficiency in agriculture: A nonparametric approach. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.30811.
DSSU [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy] (2022). http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
EAA [European Environmental Agency] (2019). The European Environment – State and Outlook 2020: Knowledge for Transition to a Sustainable Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
EC [European Commission] (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM/2020/381 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1590404602495&uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0381 (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2019). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019. Safeguarding Against Economic Slowdowns and Downturns. Rome: FAO.
Filippini R., Lardon S., Bonari E., Marraccini E. (2018). Unraveling the contribution of periurban farming systems to urban food security in developed countries. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0499-1.
Gaviglio A., Filippini R., Madau F.A., Marescotti M.E., Demartini E. (2021). Technical efficiency and productivity of farms: A periurban case study analysis. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00181-9.
Global Food Security Index (2020). https://nonews.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GFSI2020.pdf (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
Krivorak A., Demyanenko S. (2011). Rodovoy priznak kategorii «stoimost» [Charakterystyka ogólna kategorii „koszt”]. Ekonomist, 9, 65–67.
Magarey R.D., Klammer S.S., Chappell T.M., Trexler C.M., Pallipparambil G.R., Hain E.F. (2019). Eco‐efficiency as a strategy for optimizing the sustainability of pest management. Pest Management Science, 75 (12), 3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5560.
Malorgio G., Marangon F. (2021). Agricultural business economics: The challenge of sustainability. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00179-3.
Ponomarenko V.S., Gontareva I.V. (2015). Metodolohiya kompleksnoho otsinyuvannya efektyvnosti rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Metodyka kompleksowej oceny efektywności przedsiębiorstw przemysłowych]. Kharkiv: KHNEU.
Ponomarenko V.S., Gontareva I.V. (2011). Konkurentospromozhnist’ u kompleksnomu otsinyuvanni efektyvnosti rozvytku promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Konkurencyjność w kompleksowej ocenie efektywności rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa przemysłowego]. W: V. Ponomarenko, M. Kyzym, Y. Ivanov (red.). Konkurentospromozhnist’: Problemy nauky ta praktyky: Monohrafiya. Kharkiv: FOP Pavlenko O.H., VD „INZHEK”.
Stenmarck Å., Jensen C., Quested T., Moates G. (2016). Estimates of European food waste levels. FUSIONS: Reducing food waste through social innovation. Stockholm: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4658.4721. https://www.eu-fusions.org/phocadownload/Publications/Estimates%20of%20European%20food%20waste%20levels.pdf (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
Wang G., Mi L., Hu J., Qian Z. (2022). Spatial analysis of agricultural eco-efficiency and high-quality development in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 847719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.847719.
World Bank (2022). https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators# (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
World Bank (2021). http://wdi.worldbank.org/table/4.4 (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
World Bank (2019). https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators# (dostęp: 07.07.2022).
