Older People’s Capacities and Intergenerational Mutual Support Provision in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53098/wir032019/04Keywords:
intergenerational support, older people, intergenerational relationship, VietnamAbstract
The paper focuses on the mutual support provision between older people and their children. Intergenerational exchange is considered an empirical indicator of functional solidarity, a core constituent of intergenerational solidarity (Bengtson and Roberts 1991). Types of support in this analysis include financial support, housework, care support and work assistance. Data from Vietnam National Ageing Survey 2011 were used for analysis with a sample of 2,700 participants aged 60 and older. Results suggested that older with more resources tend to involve in intergenerational mutual support provision relationships, particularly financial support. Additionally, age, marital status, living arrangement, number of children, and health condition of older parents significantly contribute to encouraging mutual support provision. Future research could focus on reciprocity models and the relationship between quality of intergenerational relationships and support exchange. Further, it could explore the outcomes of support exchanges, which results in older people’s wellbeing in advanced age.
References
Bengtson V., Roberts R.E.L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53(4), 856–870.
Chen T., Leeson G.W., Liu C. (2016). Living arrangements and intergenerational monetary transfers of older Chinese. Ageing and Society, 37(9), 1798–1823.
Chow N. (1993). The changing responsibilities of the state and family toward elders in Hong Kong. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 5(1-2), 111–126.
Costanzo L., Pedone C., Cesari M., Ferrucci L., Bandinelli S., Antonelli Incalzi R. (2018). Clusters of functional domains to identify older persons at risk of disability. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 18(5), 685–691.
Demirgüç-Kunt A., Klapper L., Panos G.A. (2016). Saving for Old Age. Policy Research Working Paper 7693, World Bank Group. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Frankenberg E., Lillard L., Willis J.R. (2002). Patterns of intergenerational transfers in Southeast Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 627–641.
Friedman J.E.D., Knodel J., Bui T.C., Truong S.A. (2002). Gender and Intergenerational Exchange in Vietnam. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
Geurts T., Poortman A.-R., van Tilburg T.G. (2012). Older parents providing child care for adult children: Does it pay off? Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 239–250.
Hogan D.P., Eggebeen D.J., Clogg C.C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchanges in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1428–1458.
Keller S. (2006). Four theories of filial duty. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56(223), 254–274.
Kendig H. (2000). Family change and family bonding in Australia. In: W.T. Liu, H. Kendig (eds.), Who Should Care for the Elderly? An East-West Value Divide, (pp. 107–125). Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Knodel J., Friedman J.E.D., Truong S.A., Bui T.C. (2000). Intergenerational exchanges in Vietnam: Family size, sex composition, and the location of children. Population Studies, 54(1), 89–104.
Le N.L. (2012). Some determinants of physical and emotional care for the elderly in Vietnamese family. Journal of Family and Gender Studies, 2, 59–73.
Le N.L., Nguyen H.M., Tran Q.L. (2011). The relationship between the elderly and their family’s members. Journal of Family and Gender Studies, 2, 50–72.
Lee H.J., Lyu J., Lee C.M., Burr J.A. (2014). Intergenerational financial exchange and the psychological well-being of older adults in the Republic of Korea. Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 30–39.
Lin I.F., Wu H.-S. (2014). Intergenerational exchange and expected support among the young-old. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 261–271.
Lin J.P., Yi C.C. (2013). A comparative analysis of intergenerational relations in East Asia. International Sociology, 28(3), 297–315.
MCST (Ministry of Culture Sport and Tourism, GSO, Institute for Families and Gender Studies, UNICEF) (2008). Results from Vietnam Family Survey 2006. Hanoi: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, UNICEF Vietnam.
Ng A.C.Y., Phillips D.R., Lee W.K.-m. (2002). Persistance and challenges to filial piety and informal support of older persons in a modern Chinese society: A case study in Tuen Mun, Hong Kong. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 135–153.
Norusis M.J. (2009). Cluster analysis. In: M.J. Norusis (ed.), PASW Statistics 18 Statistical Procedures Companion, (pp. 361–391). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Pezzin L.E., Pollak R.A., Schone B. (2004). Long-term Care and Family Decision Making. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/Long_Term_Care_and_Family_Decision_Making.pdf?paperid=329792.
Silverstein M. (2005). Intergenerational family transfers in social context. In: R. Binstock, L.K. George, S.J. Cutler, J. Hendricks, J.H. Schulz (eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, (6th Edition), (pp. 165–181). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Stuifbergen M.C., Van Delden J.J. (2011). Filial obligations to elderly parents: A duty to care? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14(1), 63–71.
UNFPA (2010). Taking Advantages of Bonus Population in Vietnam: Opportunities, Challenges and Policy Choices. Retrieved from http://vietnam.unfpa.org/en/publications/taking-advantage-demographic-bonus-viet-nam.
UNFPA (2011). The Ageing Population in Vietnam: Current Status, Prognosis, and Possible Policy Responses. Retrieved from http://vietnam.unfpa.org/sites/asiapacific/files/pub-pdf/Ageing%20report_ENG_FINAL_27.07.pdf.
Witte N.D., Hoeyberghs L., Verté E., Donder L.D., Dierckx E., Verté D., Kempen G.I.J.M., Schols J.M.G.A. (2018). The comprehensive frailty assessment instrument enables to detect multidimensional frailty in community dwelling older people. Healthy Aging Research, 7(13), 1–6.
